Find the Right Model For your Driving Needs by Comparing the 2016 Mazda CX-3 and Mazda 3 Hatchback

By Product Expert | Posted in Mazda CX-3, Mazda3 on Tuesday, August 11th, 2015 at 5:16 pm
Difference Between 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback

One is a compact car, while the other is a subcompact crossover. There are many similarities and differences to be compared between the 2016 Mazda CX-3 and Mazda 3 hatchback.

Difference Between 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback

With the introduction of the CX-3, some Mazda fans may notice similarities between Mazda’s all-new subcompact crossover and the Mazda 3 hatchback. Though they may look similar at first glance, there are some significant differences between the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 hatchback that drivers will want to be aware of when choosing between the two models.

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback Engine Specs and Performance

While the CX-3 is an all-new model from Mazda, the Mazda 3 returns for the 2016 model year with changes to trim level packaging and pricing. When it comes to the engine, however, the Mazda 3 hatchback will retain its standard 155-horsepower SKYACTIV engine, with an available 184-horsepower SKYACTIV. The CX-3 is equipped with the same 2.0-liter engine found standard on the 2016 Mazda 3, but it produces 146 horsepower and 146 lb.-ft. of torque under the hood of the subcompact crossover.

The CX-3 is also built for rough roadway conditions, as it can be equipped with the optional i-ACTIV predictive all-wheel drive system. The system can monitor data like roadway conditions and steering angle to deliver the right amount of power to the right wheels in order to maximize performance.

Difference Between 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback engine specs and performance gas mileage fuel economy cargo space

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Mazda 3 Hatchback Gas Mileage

The Mazda 3 has always been known to post some impressive fuel efficiency figures. No new fuel ratings have been release for the 2016 model year Mazda 3, but with so few changes, it is expected to remain the same on the 5-door hatchback model at a maximum fuel efficiency of 30 mpg city and 40 mpg highway.

But the CX-3 also has impressive efficiency when comparing it to other subcompact crossovers. According to Mazda and its list of subcompact crossover competitors, the CX-3 has class-leading efficiency with figures of up to 29 mpg city and 35 mpg highway.

Read more about the 2016 Mazda CX-3’s impressive fuel economy

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Mazda 3 Hatchback Pricing

The Mazda 3 has received new pricing for the 2016 model year, with the base model starting MSRP listed at $18,545. The CX-3 has a starting MSRP of $19,960.

Drivers looking for some extra power may enjoy the available 184-horsepower engine in the Mazda 3 hatchback, while drivers looking for roadway stability in rougher conditions are sure to love the CX-3’s optional AWD system. That being said, both models provide excellent fuel economy, hatchback access and ample cargo space. Now that you know the differences between the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback, contact us to learn more.

[Read more: Compare the 2016 CX-3 vs 2016 CX-5]

One Response to “Find the Right Model For your Driving Needs by Comparing the 2016 Mazda CX-3 and Mazda 3 Hatchback”

  1. Studento says:

    The main “Difference Between 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback” is that CX-3 is actually a lifted Mazda 2 and a lifted Mazda 3 is actually Mazda CX-5.
    So one should compare Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 2 and Mazda CX-5 vs Mazda 3 and not Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda 3.

Leave a Reply