Adjust Payment Terms ×

We want to help you find the perfect car that fits your budget. Please adjust the options below so we can estimate the most accurate monthly payments.

Estimated Credit Score or Interest Rate

Desired Loan Term (months)

How much will you put down?

The above payment estimations are not guaranteed. This form is for estimation purposes only.
All tax, title and vehicle registration fees are additional. See dealer for complete details.

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke

The subcompact crossover segment is the hottest new segment on the market today, but with so many options popping up, you have quite a decision to make if you're looking to buy one. We're here to help by comparing two top models in the segments: the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke. Take a look at the chart down below and keep reading to learn more, and we'll see which vehicle has the edge.

Now, the CX-3 may be a crossover, but it's still plenty of fun to drive. Part of the fun comes from the simple fact that the CX-3 is impressively efficient, even in AWD configuration. Though the Juke can achieve nearly the same fuel economy, the figures posted down below only come from the Juke's NISMO trim with a manual transmission. If that doesn't suit you, the highest fuel economy rating for the Juke is 28 city and 32 highway mpg.

View Our Inventory

2016 Mazda CX-3 VS 2016 Nissan Juke
35.0 inches Rear Seat Legroom 32.1 inches
Up to 44.5 cu ft Cargo Volume Up to 35.9 cu ft
Available AWD Available
Up to 29 city/35 hwy MPG Up to 28 city/34 hwy

Differences Between the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke

Both models come available with AWD, with the CX-3 offering Mazda's predictive i-ACTIV AWD system. The system is predictive, rather than just reactive, helping to detect wheel slips before they even occur and delivering power to where it needs to go. \

Inside the two vehicles, rear seat passengers will find a bit more legroom in the 2016 CX-3. But, this isn't at the expense of cargo space, as the CX-3 completely has the edge in that area with up to 44.5 cu ft of cargo space when the rear seats are folded down. Plus, the CX-3 comes standard with a touchscreen infotainment system and a rearview camera.

We can't compare every feature between the 2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Nissan Juke, so we suggest going for a spin instead. Contact us at Mazda of Lodi to learn more or to schedule time behind the wheel. We are certain you'll have a blast with Mazda's subcompact crossover.

2016 mazda cx-3 in pearl white
grille design on the 2016 mazda cx-3
2016 mazda cx-3 with two tone leather seats
2016 mazda cx-3 rear bumper door design